Skip to content

BoF Meetecho Chat

Session:
BoF
Date:
Time:
(UTC +0100)
Room:
Main Room
Transcript:
Not Available

Stephen Farrell - 2026-05-18 18:02:39
@mcr: maybe https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en

Michael Richardson - 2026-05-18 18:14:21
the key to understanding IPv10 is that it's *HEX*, so, version 16 for a 4-bit field :-)

Michael Richardson - 2026-05-18 18:30:52
DHC WG is our forever group.

Jen Linkova - 2026-05-18 18:31:11
What is the oldest wg, actually?

Jen Linkova - 2026-05-18 18:31:36
Should we celebrate?

Jen Linkova - 2026-05-18 18:32:52
Like, which WG id allowed to buy alcohol?

Michael Richardson - 2026-05-18 18:36:59
I thought ROLL goes back to 2006, but DT says 2009. So, it's just hitting 18, I guess.

Petra Zeidler - 2026-05-18 18:41:16
dnsop started in 1999

Petra Zeidler - 2026-05-18 18:41:47
mpls in 1997

Keith Mitchell - 2026-05-18 18:41:53
Connect-wg was previously eix-wg and AFIACR started sometime in the late 90s too

Michael Richardson - 2026-05-18 18:46:35
2/3 of the people cared enough to be in the room, rather than drinking coffee, but aren't further involved.

Andrew Campling - 2026-05-18 18:47:37
We shouldn't assume that those that participate in both the IETF and RIPE are all operators

Michael Richardson - 2026-05-18 18:48:06
what was the new result?

Andrew Campling - 2026-05-18 18:48:21
Not many, from what I could see

Andrew Campling - 2026-05-18 18:51:11
There is also a need for more participation from enterprises and cybersecurity companies at the IETF, not just operators

Jen Linkova - 2026-05-18 18:54:40
I think we might understand "operator" differently :) I'm operating an enterprise network, and I do identify as an operator

Michael Richardson - 2026-05-18 18:56:12
I offer to get onto any kind of video-confering to help setup your I-D process. It's gotten overly complex: it sings, dances, and shines your shoes, and probably, you only need a pair of warm socks.

Petra Zeidler - 2026-05-18 18:58:39
I've participated in IETF mailing lists in the past, but I've never attended a IETF meeting. I could afford it but it would be a rather expensive hobby, given zero expected financial gain

Michael Richardson - 2026-05-18 18:58:57
deleting entire threads from IETF mailing lists is relatively easy; acting on review contents is what takes actual hours :-)

Andrew Campling - 2026-05-18 18:59:59
Perhaps use AI email clients to summarise everything 😀

Jen Linkova - 2026-05-18 19:01:09
@perta yes. I guess it's often hard to estimate direct gain from the IETF (or from the ROPE meeting, for that matter) - it does deo

Jen Linkova - 2026-05-18 19:01:32
It does depend on the issues you need to solve.

Jen Linkova - 2026-05-18 19:02:34
A success story: I was running of v4, I needed a way to deploy ipv6 incrementally - I came to the IETF and we developed a *deployable* way of doing this

Michael Richardson - 2026-05-18 19:03:03
What I'm hearing from Jim is that maybe a future BOF ought to do a role-play of a newcoming commenting/contributing to an I-D?

Michael Richardson - 2026-05-18 19:04:28
As a small operator, are you having problems with the tools you have, and are the problems you have with the tools, or with the lack of complete implementation of a specification?

Michael Richardson - 2026-05-18 19:05:50
What Lee said. The BOF is where we need a lot more operator involvement.

Petra Zeidler - 2026-05-18 19:06:27
@Jen I dabble in Open Source in my spare time

Ulka Athale - 2026-05-18 19:09:18
Thanks everyone - that's the end of the sessions for today.